|
||||
Personal blog of christian
|
Author, Author!I’ve got a fun treat for you folks today. It’s been my joy to be friends with author Nancy Moser since the moment we met at a writers group in Kansas City, I don’t know—maybe twelve years ago. If you don’t know about Nancy and her wonderful books, you’re missing out. I want better for you! I hope you’ll feel a part of my conversation with Nancy so much that you’ll leave a comment on this post. (Hey, ask her a question! She can deal!) From the commenters, I’ll choose one fortunate fallible reader who’ll receive a free copy of either Mozart’s Sister or The Good Nearby—your choice. Even if you won a book here just last week, you still qualify. That’s the kind of fallible blogger I am! Katy: Nancy, tell us a bit about how you got into writing. You have a degree in architecture, right? How did you get from there to here? Nancy: I’ve always loved to write, but life got in the way. I’m sure many writers can relate to that one. My husband also graduated in architecture, and there were few jobs in that market, so I let him go that route and I took other jobs. Then we had three kids and started a subcontracting business, where I learned accounting by just doing it! Katy: Eeeeeewwww. I keep accounts for our corporation, too. But somehow I still don’t think I’ve learned accounting. Hmmm….I digress, huh? Nancy: Indeed. Anyway, I still wrote on the side. I started out trying to write children’s books (thinking that would be easy) but got no where. I’m way too wordy! Then I wrote short humor essays that did get published in various magazines. Katy: If I remember right, the night we met you’d just had a humor article published in Good Housekeeping. I thought that was amazing—heck, I still think so. Nancy: Eventually, lots of those published articles were compiled into three books of inspirational humor (“Save Me, I Fell in the Carpool†is one.) But during all this noodling, I was also writing novels. Katy: Is there such a thing as low-carb noodling? Maybe this is where I’m going wrong… Nancy: I noodled my way through five novels for the secular market, basically learning how to write as I wrote. And rewrote. And rewrote. I can’t number the rejections I received! But in 1995 I had a God-moment that led me closer to Him, and changed the direction of my writing. Since then, I’ve had 15 inspirational novels published. So I guess that proves that once you get on the road He has for you, things start happening. In retrospect, I’m so thankful for all those initial rejections. Without them, I would never have found the right road. Katy: A writer’s habits seem to hold endless fascination for us. A lot of readers and wannabe writers picture an attic garret, albeit one with central air in the summer, but still. Do you keep a set schedule? Are you what they call a seat-of-the-pants writer, or do you have everything plotted out and outlined before you start? What about writing tools? PC or Mac? Ballpoint or fountain? Palm Pilot or Alphasmart? Nancy: Since I now have deadlines (which is a good thing), I have become very organized. My novels are generally 95,000-105,000 words. So when I get a contract and a deadline, I print up calendar pages from the present to the due date, and with a highlighter mark the weekdays available for writing (taking out vacations, weekends, known busy days, etc.) That gives me a true idea of how much time I have to write the book. Then I keep out a week at the end to reread everything, add up the days, divide them into 95,000, and find a daily word count number as my goal. Katy: I’m getting dizzy. That’s a lot of math. Or accounting. Or one of those other skills I haven’t learned. Nancy: For my current book on Jane Austen, I’m writing 1400 words per day. But with “Mozart’s Sister†it was only 750. I get up early (about 5), do my email and other computer junk, and make myself start writing at 8 (if not before.) I sit in the chair (except for coffee and potty breaks) until I’ve got my quota. Katy: You take potty breaks? Just kidding. Nancy: Ah. I generally write 500-600 words an hour, though that can obviously vary greatly. So you see, I only write mornings. I’m usually done by 11:30. I write weekend mornings, too, but those are bonuses. And in the afternoons and evenings I am free to live the rest of my life. Yet I admit I’m always thinking about writing. It never truly leaves me. Katy: Favorite tools of the trade? Nancy: I use a PC, and an Alphasmart (I love this thing!) I have an office in the basement with a lovely view (I have come to adore “viewsâ€) and sit with the keyboard in my lap, and my feet up on a milk-stool. And yes, I admit to being a seat-of-the-pants writer for my contemporary novels. Though as the novels progress, I do get clues about where they are going and certainly write those ideas down, which I suppose is a form of outlining. Just not up front. Katy: Until recently, you’ve written all contemporary women’s fiction, right? And now….what? Nancy: Historicals…a whole new ball game. I’m fictionalizing the life of a real person, which involves a ton of research. I do a lot of prep work for those books, and generally find one biographer I really love and read the book clear through, making copious notes in the margins, and marking possible “scenes.†Then I transcribe the notes to my computer, put the “scenes†in chronological order, and begin. The writing is the easy part! Katy: Spoken like a true pro. Nancy: While I’m writing, I have 3-4 reference books open at all times, getting many takes on a particular moment in the subject’s life. I also footnote my manuscript for the use of myself and my editor (it’s important to remember where I’ve found a piece of information.) When I can use the subject’s own words (usually taken from letters), I do. I love that. And of course the footnotes are removed in the final manuscript. Katy: If you could give aspiring writers one piece of advice besides the obvious BOC (butt on chair), what would it be? Or is the obvious obvious for an obvious reason? :) Nancy: BOC is essential. Even if it’s only for 30 minutes a day. That adds up. When I had three kids I used to try to write with them running around me, being . . . kids. I started to resent them; they were keeping me from achieving my dream. Not a good thing. That’s what got me started getting up so early. I needed to find a time when no one else was up! Now, with my first grandchild on the way (I just found out!) I’m still getting up early. Seven days a week. Katy: You’re the youngest looking grandma I’ve seen in a while. Congrats! Nancy: Thanks! The other piece of advice is to read good books and figure out why you like them. And on the flip side, don’t waste your time reading bad books (though perhaps figuring out why they are bad could be useful too.) If a book doesn’t grab me in 25 pages, I put it down. Keep that in mind with your own writing… Katy: No offense, but when you say “keep that in mind with your own writing,” are you, like, referring to MY OWN WRITING? Nancy: No offense taken. Yes. Katy:Mozart’s Sister is a new writing venture for you, isn’t it? Can you tell us how the idea ever occurred to you? And isn’t it unusual to attempt historical fiction in first person, from the point-of-view of a known historical character? Nancy: My old mantra was “I don’t do research. I hate research.†I never planned on writing historicals. But two years ago I was standing in Mozart’s house in Salzburg, Austria, and heard the tour guide say, “Some people don’t know this, but Mozart’s sister was just as talented as he was, but because she was a woman, she didn’t receive the same opportunities to use her talent.†I found this interesting and when I got home, I put it in the proposal for a contemporary novel I was putting together. I created a modern author who was writing a book called “Mozart’s Sister.†Katy: Sounds like a winner to me…. Nancy: I thought so, too. My agent sent the proposal out, and within a few days, I got a call from Dave Horton at Bethany House Publishers. “I don’t want the contemporary novel, I want Mozart’s Sister.†I told him, “But I don’t write historicals.†“I want Mozart’s Sister. First person. Her point of view.†“But I write third person, big cast novels.†“I want Mozart’s Sister.†“But I don’t do research.†It was like that. Katy: Yikes! Nancy: Because of Dave’s persistence and vision, I wrote “Mozart’s Sister†and found it the most satisfying and personally exciting book I’ve ever written. To give a woman-of-history a voice…I take the responsibility very seriously and try my hardest to do their lives justice. I am currently writing a fictionalized biography of Jane Austen’s life. I will say capturing Jane’s “voice†is a real challenge. Katy: The research you did for Mozart’s Sister must have been extensive, because the sense of factual accuracy enhances the story line all the way through. Explain to us what kind of documents you used in researching to ground the story in reality. Was it difficult to find the documents you needed to create an accurate timeline of events, for instance? Nancy: It was very difficult to find information about Nannerl Mozart, because all the books are about her brother, Wolfgang. When she is mentioned it is a part of his story. But luckily, the Mozarts were avid letter writers, and the father Leopold insisted that the letters were kept (he must have had some inkling how important they would be for future generations.) Those letters were invaluable, and often I was able to use quotes. I also found Nannerl’s diary—in German—and bought it, planning to have it translated. But then I found reference to it in other books, and they said it was disappointing because it offered no insight into her feelings, but was simply a “I went walking in the garden†type of diary. The timeline was not that difficult because of the letters. But there were stretches of time when events are unknown—especially when all the family was together in one place. No letters. No information. I did my best to fit the pieces together. Katy: For some reason, I always imagine people in previous generations to be more compliant with the dictates of the society they lived in than we are today. Yet you portray a girl who is clearly not pleased with her “place,” which is always somehow secondary to her younger brother, Wolfgang. How common do you think it was in those days for a woman to yearn to use her God-given talents outside the sphere of her own home? Nancy: I think women felt the urge to be all they could be, yet not to the same extent that we do now. It’s like a person who’s never tasted chocolate. They don’t yearn for chocolate because they don’t know how wonderful it is. Katy: O taste and see that the chocolate is good… Nancy: I know! Women of history had little freedom and few choices. That is the life they knew. I believe they had inklings of other life possibilities, but didn’t know how to make it happen, or even realize how good it might be. In fact, this phenomenon is one reason why it’s difficult for me to find subjects to write about. Generally, those few women who bucked the system to get what they wanted, did so with gusto. They were often scandalous women who had illegitimate children, affairs, and generally got in big trouble according to the eyes of society. Although their lives are certainly interesting, I choose to write about women who inspire and who achieved within the system. If any readers have ideas for another woman-of-history that might make a good subject, I’d love to hear from them: Visit my site or email me! Katy: You know what? It would be just like fallible readers to come up with some great suggestions! Any other titles coming out soon? Nancy: I have a book coming out at the end of October, “The Good Nearby.†It’s a contemporary novel about people searching for meaning and a girl who has the number 96 appear in her life over and over (what does it mean?) It involves being the “good nearby†in other people’s lives, seeing “the good nearby†in your own life, and knowing that God is “the good nearby†in all our lives. Katy: Nancy, I gotta say it: You’ve personally been the Good Nearby to me in so many ways, for so many years. Thanks for your friendship, and for sharing your time with us here!
Posted by Katy on 10/07/06 at 09:23 PM
Fallible Comments...
Page 1 of 1 pages
Next entry: To The Nines Previous entry: Mother Of The Fried |
|||